I honestly don’t understand why asking questions or making suggestions is seen as an attack. I see a problem that needs a fair solution. The current suggested proposal doesn’t seem to have broad community support, which is why people are exploring alternatives. This shouldn’t be about being with or against anyone.
My suggestion of three independent supervisors, chosen through community governance and not by PF, is about neutrality. It protects the community, but also protects the current directors from doubts about whether the process was fair.
A lot of relevant information isn’t public, so it’s difficult for the community to judge either side fairly. As Rene mentioned, there is already a Supervisor, and Rose is trying to clarify their role and powers. I think we should wait for that reply before jumping to conclusions or deciding what needs to happen next.
We just want transparency, fairness and what’s best for Terra.