There’s a lot of text here, so let me quickly summarise my understanding to bring everyone up to speed:
— Despite otherwise being in agreement on literally every other proposal, Vini voted “no” on a single proposal that would have directly benefited 0xPhilipp.
— Claiming a “deadlock”, 0xPhilipp then tried to have Vini removed and move to 2-of-3 Rule
— The vote to remove Vini failed, but 0xPhilipp still withheld Vini’s pay last month anyway.
— 0xPhilipp is now proposing the community pay $10,000 for someone to agree with him.
— There is now a debate on who the patsy should be.
… Did I miss anything or does that about sum it up?