{"id":153,"name":null,"username":"ValidatorOperator","avatar_template":"/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/49beb7/{size}.png","created_at":"2026-10-17T09:41:40.223Z","cooked":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan class=\"bbcode-u\"\u003eThere’s a lot of text here, so let me quickly summarise my understanding to bring everyone up to speed:\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e— Despite otherwise being in agreement on literally every other proposal, Vini voted “no” on a \u003cem\u003esingle proposal\u003c/em\u003e that would have \u003cem\u003edirectly benefited\u003c/em\u003e 0xPhilipp.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e— Claiming a “\u003cem\u003edeadlock\u003c/em\u003e”, 0xPhilipp then tried to have Vini removed and move to 2-of-3 Rule\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e— The vote to remove Vini failed, but 0xPhilipp \u003cem\u003estill withheld Vini’s pay\u003c/em\u003e last month anyway.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e— 0xPhilipp is now proposing the \u003cem\u003ecommunity pay $10,000\u003c/em\u003e for someone to agree with him.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e— There is now a debate on who the patsy should be.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e… Did I miss anything or does that about sum it up?\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","post_number":15,"post_type":1,"posts_count":87,"updated_at":"2026-10-17T09:41:40.223Z","reply_count":1,"reply_to_post_number":null,"quote_count":0,"incoming_link_count":0,"reads":19,"readers_count":18,"score":8.8,"yours":false,"topic_id":47,"topic_slug":"phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor","display_username":null,"primary_group_name":null,"flair_name":null,"flair_url":null,"flair_bg_color":null,"flair_color":null,"flair_group_id":null,"badges_granted":[],"version":1,"can_edit":false,"can_delete":false,"can_recover":false,"can_see_hidden_post":false,"can_wiki":false,"user_title":null,"bookmarked":false,"raw":"**[u]There's a lot of text here, so let me quickly summarise my understanding to bring everyone up to speed:[/u]**\n\n— Despite otherwise being in agreement on literally every other proposal, Vini voted \"no\" on a *single proposal* that would have *directly benefited* 0xPhilipp.\n\n— Claiming a \"*deadlock*\", 0xPhilipp then tried to have Vini removed and move to 2-of-3 Rule\n\n— The vote to remove Vini failed, but 0xPhilipp *still withheld Vini's pay* last month anyway.\n\n— 0xPhilipp is now proposing the *community pay $10,000* for someone to agree with him.\n\n— There is now a debate on who the patsy should be.\n\n**... Did I miss anything or does that about sum it up?**","actions_summary":[],"moderator":false,"admin":false,"staff":false,"user_id":81,"hidden":false,"trust_level":1,"deleted_at":null,"user_deleted":false,"edit_reason":null,"can_view_edit_history":true,"wiki":false,"post_url":"/t/phoenix-foundation-appointment-of-an-emergency-supervisor/47/15","reactions":[],"current_user_reaction":null,"reaction_users_count":0,"current_user_used_main_reaction":false,"can_accept_answer":false,"can_unaccept_answer":false,"accepted_answer":false,"topic_accepted_answer":null}